University of Miami Business Law Review
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal placed a squeeze on the once touted liberal Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by requiring judges to consider the veracity of potential plaintiffs' federal claims in light of Iqbal's new heightened pleading standard. This article examines post-Iqbal pleading standards across United States jurisdictions and argues that states should exert caution before choosing to adopt Iqbal's new "plausibility" standard, and if they elect to modify their pleading standards in light of the Iqbal decision, they should also carefully contemplate their method of adoption.
Recommended Citation
Mark W. Payne,
The Post-Iqbal State of Pleading: An Argument Opposing a Uniform National Pleading Regime,
20 U. MIA Bus. L. Rev.
245
(2012)
Available at:
https://repository.law.miami.edu/umblr/vol20/iss2/5