Presumptions and Burdens of Proof in Determining Competency to Stand Trial: An Analysis of Medina v. California and the Supreme Court's New Due Process Methodology in Criminal Cases

Authors

Bruce J. Winick

Recommended Citation

Bruce J. Winick, Presumptions and Burdens of Proof in Determining Competency to Stand Trial: An Analysis of Medina v. California and the Supreme Court's New Due Process Methodology in Criminal Cases, 47 U. Mia. L. Rev. 817 (1993).
Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol47/iss3/7