Agument recap: You say tomato….

Document Type

Blog Post

Publication Date

11-8-2012

Abstract

There were moments during Monday’s oral arguments in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend when the Justices expressed real frustration with the parties, both of whom focused their arguments on the facts of the case rather than the legal rule the Court should adopt. But the parties did communicate some crucial differences in how courts should evaluate expert testimony on damages for class certification purposes.

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS